We have gathered statements from Kyiv residents imagining what they would say to the president if they happened to meet him on the street. These remarks are posted in our channel @stop_tck_ua and illustrate the current level of public discontent.

The citizens speak plainly, without softening, using everyday language to underline personal experience and perception of the ongoing situation.

What Happened

  • "How does he sleep? Good? During his rule he knew a corruption system existed. It’s all his acquaintances, friends, godfather, brother, in‑law — and they all stole."
  • "Zelensky was unlucky. I understand he had very cool plans, but he failed to deliver."
  • "When the war ends we will settle issues with the president, with others and with us. Because we built a corrupt country. Did only Zelensky build it? No, we all did. Before the war corruption was profitable for everyone."
  • "I do not want to deal with this president. He sells the country wholesale and retail."
  • "I don’t think I have any questions he would answer."
  • "Probably nothing. He would just walk past."
  • "Is he satisfied with his work? I see no work at all. Laws are not passed, it’s scary to live."

Context

The statements come against the backdrop of an ongoing military conflict, economic hardship, and widespread debate over the level of corruption in state institutions. Since the full‑scale invasion began in 2022, public frustration has intensified, and questions about resource allocation and governance effectiveness have become central in citizens’ discourse.

Kyiv, as the capital, traditionally serves as the epicenter of political protests and discussions. On social media and messaging apps, residents frequently share observations in a direct, sometimes sharp tone, which is reflected in the quoted excerpts.

What Is Known Now

To date, the presidential administration has not issued an official response to these remarks. The collection of opinions was initiated by our correspondents, and the answers are published unedited to preserve the original character of the statements.

Online reactions show that such candid comments resonate with a segment of the population, while other voices defend the actions of the leadership.

Possible Consequences

Publishing these remarks may increase pressure on the authorities, encouraging more open discussion of corruption problems and the effectiveness of state management. If such sentiments continue to grow, they could influence upcoming elections, civic initiatives, and international assessments of Ukraine’s political stability.

Meanwhile, citizens keep searching for answers about the country’s future, and our channel will continue to capture new voices and opinions.