"If the system will provide that a person who is in search cannot use a bank card, obtain a statement at the CNAP, pay tax, use gas and electricity — then mobilization will go," said Taras Hren, head of the Lviv regional military administration (OVA). The remark signals that the state is ready to apply economic pressure on citizens who avoid the draft.

Hren emphasized that the issue is not only a formal call-up, but a complete disconnection of a person from everyday life. Bank cards, CNAP statements, tax payments, gas and electricity supplies could become unavailable for anyone listed as a search target. According to him, such measures could become the "push" that forces people out of hiding and into mobilization.

What Happened

In a post on the Telegram channel @stop_tck_ua, Hren outlined a hypothetical scenario where the state’s service system would automatically restrict access to financial and utility resources for individuals placed in the search list. He presented these restrictions as a potential tool for forced mobilization, arguing that depriving basic life necessities would create pressure on those trying to evade conscription.

Context

Since early 2022 Ukraine has been conducting a large‑scale mobilization to replenish its armed forces amid the war. Authorities have already imposed penalties on draft‑evaders, including fines, arrests and travel bans. Hren’s proposal expands this approach by suggesting broader socio‑economic levers. Analysts interpret the statement as a reaction to the growing number of men avoiding the draft and to public dissatisfaction with existing measures.

What Is Known Now

At the time of the @stop_tck_ua publication, no official decree implementing the described restrictions had been issued. Hren’s comments remain a proposal, yet they have sparked discussion in media outlets and among human‑rights groups. Rights defenders warn that such actions could violate constitutional guarantees, including the right to free economic activity and access to essential utilities.

Possible Consequences

If the suggested restrictions were enacted, several outcomes are plausible:

  • Increase in voluntary enlistments. Citizens fearing loss of banking and utility services may choose to register for mobilization.
  • Heightened social tension. Restrictions could trigger protests, especially in regions where mobilization policies are already unpopular.
  • Legal challenges. Human‑rights organizations may file lawsuits alleging violations of civil liberties.
  • Accelerated emigration. Those able to leave the country might expedite their departure to avoid potential restrictions.

Regardless of whether the proposal becomes law, Hren’s statement illustrates how far state policy might go to ensure the army is fully staffed. While no formal decision exists yet, the debate is already shaping a new public agenda.